Friday, October 23, 2015

Protection of Marriage as a Common Good in the Modern World

        In the Gospel of Matthew, Jesus said to the Pharisees:
Have you not read that the one who made them at the beginning ‘made them male and female,’ and said, ‘For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’? So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate (Matt 19:4-6).
Marriage is a sacrament of the Catholic Church in which a man and a woman, by submitting to God’s plan for man at the beginning and acting in accordance with the Lord’s words, establish a matrimonial covenant between themselves for the whole of their lives. Together they form a family of mutual love. But the family “does not end with the couple, because it makes them capable of the greatest possible gift, the gift by which they become cooperators with God for giving life to a new human person” (FC 14), thereby fulfilling His blessing to man at the beginning of Creation, “Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it” (Gen 1:28).
        “The family, which is founded and given life by love, is a community of persons: of husband and wife, of parents and children, of relatives” (FC 18). Building a family is not just in the interest of a particular person, but it is extended to the spouse, their children, relatives and the common good of the society. This is pretty much in line with the famous Chinese saying of Confucius in the Great Learning, “修身, 齊家, 治國, 平天下”, which essentially means that when one’s personal life is cultivated, one’s family will be in harmony, and as a result one’s country will be well governed, and when all the countries are well governed, there will be peace throughout the world. Even outside the Church, it is a common understanding among different nations and different peoples that marriage is a profound good of universal value which perfects man as a social being; protects the well-being of children; and sustains the civil society and promotes common good. This basically explains why human laws have been established in almost every country to protect married people and their children, albeit to different extents.
        In virtually every community, the institution of marriage serves three important public purposes. First, marriage is the institution through which societies seek to organize the bearing and rearing of children. It is a natural human instinct that children cling to their mother at the young age, and it is equally important to ensure that they have the love and support of their father. Second, marriage provides direction, order, and stability to adult sexual unions and to their economic, social, and biological consequences. Third, marriage civilizes men, furnishing them with a sense of purpose, norms, and social status that orient their lives away from vice and toward virtue (Witherspoon 9). Therefore, it is apparent that good marriages and family lives are conducive to achieving common good in society.
        Unfortunately, we see so many and frequent breakdowns in marriage and family in the modern world. The most common threats are divorce, illegitimacy, cohabitation and same-sex marriage. All these lead to instability of the society and increase the burden of the society in one way or another. Children suffer most from divorce. They are significantly more likely to divorce as adults, to suffer from mental illness and delinquency, to drop out of high school, to have poor relationships with one or both parents, and to have difficulty committing themselves to a relationship (Witherspoon 17). Children are also the primary victim of illegitimacy (i.e., non-marital child-bearing). Most of them spend the majority of their childhood in a single parent home, the adverse effect of which is similar to that of divorce. Non-marital child-bearing also has negative impacts on the parents, many of whom are youths not yet ready psychologically and financially to establish a family. They are more likely to experience educational failure, earn less and have difficulty in finding a good marriage partner (Witherspoon 17).
        Cohabitation has become very popular in the Western culture. Currently, 60% of all marriages in the United States are preceded by cohabitation, but fewer than half of cohabiting unions end in marriage (For Your Marriage, Cohabitation). Cohabiting union is particularly risky to children. They are more likely to engage in delinquent behavior, be suspended from school, and cheat in school, and most seriously, those cohabiting with an unrelated male adult face significantly higher risks of sexual or physical abuse. One study found that preschool children living in households with unrelated adults (typically a mother’s boyfriend) were nearly 50 times more likely to be killed than were children living with both biological parents. As for the adults, they face higher rates of domestic violence, sexual infidelity, and instability, compared to couples in marital unions. Of course, this has serious adverse impacts on the happy and healthy growth of children as well (Witherspoon 18).
        “The major threat that same-sex marriages pose to traditional unions is that they redefine the institution of marriage” (Sokolowski, I). People of the same sex can have sex, but they cannot procreate through the natural means of sexual intercourse between a man and a woman. Society has an interest of seeing there will be a next generation being brought up in a virtuous and law-abiding manner. Traditionally, public authorities view reproduction as a good end of marriage and a common good. On the other hand, “proponents of same-sex marriages want to unlink marriage from reproduction and have the laws legalize their friendship because it is a friendship, not because it is procreative” (Sokolowski, IV). This poses a serious threat to the definition of marriage and its creeping effect is that the public authority will have to consider legalizing any sort of friendships and not same-sex marriage alone. The societal impacts of re-definition of marriage can be huge and even unbearable to the continuation of the human race. This partly explains why the Catholic Church adopts a persistent stance on the intrinsically evil homosexual act. The Catechism states that homosexual acts “are contrary to the natural law. They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved” (CCC 2357).
        The empirical evidence in support of marriage is clear. “Only when marriage is valued as good in itself, and not simply as a means to other good ends, will children, adults, and societies reap its profound benefits” (Witherspoon 20). Regrettably, many people in the modern era no longer cherish marriage as a community good, and they are adopting an individualistic approach in making their own personal “good” decisions of commitment and love. And the problem is aggravated among the youths by the social media, making things such as speed dating and casual sex more and more common. Catholics have the responsibility to protect the values of marriage and family in accordance with the natural law as illuminated by the Lord’s words. We should always bear in mind and be consistent in our words and in our acts that marriage is a common good and should be protected in its integrity in the modern world.

Bibliography
Catechism of the Catholic Church. New York: Doubleday, 1995. Print.
"Cohabitation." For Your Marriage. N.p., n.d. Web. 21 Feb. 2015.
Coogan, Michael D. The New Oxford Annotated Bible: New Revised Standard Version with Apocrypha. N.p.: Oxford UP, 2010. Print.
Pope John Paul II. "Familiaris Consortio." Vatican, n.d. Web. 19 Feb. 2015.
Sokolowski, Robert. The Threat of Same-Sex Marriage. <http://ezproxy.sjcme.edu:2048/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=13286361&site=ehost-live>
Witherspoon Institute. Marriage and the Public Good: Ten Principles. Witherspoon Institute, 2008. <http://protectmarriage.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/WI_Marriage.pdf>.

No comments:

Post a Comment