Wednesday, July 30, 2014

Missionary Efforts of the Church in Modern Times

        Jesus said to his apostles before his glorious Ascension, “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything that I have commanded you” (Matt 28:19-20). The Church follows Jesus’ command to spread the Gospel throughout the world. The pilgrim Church is missionary by her very nature, since she carries out the mission which has begun in Christ, and is carried forward in the mission of the Holy Spirit in accordance with the work committed to her in this world by the Father for the salvation of mankind (Lumen Gentium 48).

        Prior to Vatican II, the Vatican generally adopted the stance that the Catholic religion should be regarded as the one and only true religion on earth, even to the extent of excluding all other forms of worship in the countries where Catholicism was the state religion. For example, one of the “errors” pointed by Pope Pius IX in his Syllabus of Errors is that “every man is free to embrace and profess that religion (not Catholicism) which, guided by the light of reason, he shall consider true” (Syllabus of Errors 15). If this “error” is taken literally, a man was not allowed to profess another religion than Catholicism as a true religion, i.e., there was no religious freedom not only in the Church, but in the Catholic States!

        Vatican II has significantly changed this stance. The Decree on Ecumenism, Unitatis Redintegratio was issued on 21 November 1964 in a bid to restore the unity of all Christians. It stipulates that men who believe in Christ and have been truly baptized in those separated Churches and Communities are in communion with the Catholic Church even though this communion is imperfect (UR 3). The Declaration on Religious Freedom, Dignitatis Humanae was issued on 7 December 1965 to declare that the human person has a right to religious freedom, which has its foundation in the very dignity of the individual. A man is bound to follow his conscience in order that he may come to God, the end and purpose of life. The exercise of religion, of its very nature, consists before all else in those internal, voluntary and free acts whereby man sets the course of his life directly toward God (DH 3). Indeed, different expressions of the Christian faith can coexist in a society and make room for different political positions, which nevertheless have in common a central set of standard values, the binding force of which simultaneously safeguards a maximum of freedom (Ratzinger 218). As such, it is infeasible and in fact inappropriate to force people to believe in the Catholic religion to the contrary of a man’s conscience. In fact, according to the Declaration on the Relation of the Church with Non-Christian Religions, Nostra Aetate, the Catholic Church rejects nothing that is true and holy in non-Christian religions, as they often reflect a ray of the Truth which enlightens all men (NA 2). This paper discusses the ways in which Vatican IIs views on religious freedom and ecumenism influence the Church’s missionary efforts and the roles that could played by the use of social media in this respect.

        Even after two centuries’ hard work, it remains a gigantic task to accomplish the Lord’s command to spread the Gospel to all the nations and peoples. About one-third of the population in the world is Christians while the total number of Catholics account for around 18% of the world’s population (Wikipedia). Moreover, in some populated countries such as China and India, the percentage of Christians in the country remains very low (less than 5%). While these places have their own non-Christian traditions and religions, it is important for Christians who belong to the minority to bear witness in Christ by example of their own lives in order for non-believers to gain a personal knowledge of God and Jesus our Savior. Christians are the salt of the earth and the light of the world (c.f. Matt 5:13-14). They should show the people among whom they live, and should converse with them, so that the non-believers may learn by sincere and patient dialogue what treasures a generous God has provided to mankind through His unfailing love (Ad Gentes 12).

        In territories where Christianity is not a mainstream religion meaning that there are plenty of opportunities for missionary work, Catholics ought to know the problems and the benefits in their apostolate which derive from the ecumenical movement. Ecumenical dialogue between Catholics and our separated brethren must proceed with love for the truth, with charity, and with humility to avoid bearing a false witness to the non-believers as if Christ has been divided. As Paul wrote to the Corinthians, we are not baptized in the name of Paul or Apollos or Cephas, but in Christ to become his followers (c.f. 1 Cor 1:12-13). Because of this reason, Catholics should collaborate and pray with other Christians so that we can apply the Gospel together especially in matters of common concern such as care for the poor and the afflicted, moral issues and social justice. In Hong Kong, the place where I live, for example, recent debates in the Hong Kong society on same-sex marriage have also triggered ecumenical dialogues on natural law, human dignity and religious freedom. When Christians of different denominations are closely connected together and with non-Christians in their life and work, Christ's disciples will be able to render to others true witness of Christ, and to work for the salvation of mankind, even where they may not be able to announce Christ fully in a formal Church setting. For Christians are not only seeking a material progress and prosperity for men, but promoting the dignity and brotherly union among all men, teaching those religious and moral truths which Christ illumined with His light. In this way, Christians are gradually opening up a fuller approach to God for the people, particularly in territories where the penetration of Christianity is still low (AG 12).

        In spreading Christ’s message to the other people, the Church can and should make use of modern technologies to make the message more pervasive. Pope John Paul II made an excellent point:

Do not be afraid of new technologies! These rank “among the marvelous things” – inter mirifica – which God has placed at our disposal to discover, to use and to make known the truth, also the truth about our dignity and about our destiny as his children, heirs of his eternal Kingdom (The Rapid Development).

Both the Vatican and the particular Churches have already made good use social media platforms and tools such as Youtube, Facebook, Twitter and mobile apps to enable more widespread dissemination of God’s Word. Nevertheless, adopting social media by the Church hierarchy alone is not enough. As we have already seen, the laity also has a key role to play in spreading the Gospel and in evangelizing and sanctifying men. Nowadays, Christians are closely connected to their non-Christian relatives and friends of their social and professional circles in the cyber space through the social media. A Twitter message of the Pope can ripple to and reach millions of non-believers by the sharing of Catholics with their Facebook and Twitter friends. The Pope App also provides a mobile platform for sharing the Pope’s daily activities and messages to people anytime and anywhere. Personally, I make use of this app to keep a close watch of the Pope’s activities and share his messages and thoughts with my Facebook friends, many of whom are non-Christians, whenever I find them useful to my evangelization work. In this manner, the laity can help the hierarchy of the Church to spread the faith of Christ very widely and effectively among the non-believers with whom they live or have professional connections – an obligation which is all the more urgent, because very many men can hear of Christ and of the Gospel only by means of the laity who are their neighbors. Through the laity’s active participation in spreading the Gospel using the social media, they can fulfill a special mission of proclaiming the Gospel and communicating Christian teachings, so as to add vigor to the nascent Church (AG 21).

        When a non-believer begins to open his heart to receive the message of God, he must establish a personal relationship with Him in Christ. It is of paramount importance that religious freedom is in place for people to accept faith. The Church strictly forbids forcing anyone to embrace the faith, or alluring or enticing people by worrisome wiles. By the same token, she also strongly insists on this right, that no one be frightened away from the faith by unjust vexations on the part of others (AG 13). In Hong Kong, although citizens enjoy full religious freedom in worship, this does not necessarily imply that they are totally immune with issues on religious freedom. Accepting faith requires the progressive change of a man’s conscience and values into Christ’s. The convert’s motives of becoming a Christian can sometimes be a challenge in conveying and accepting faith. In Hong Kong, for example, some catechumens join catechism classes because they want their children to be baptized in order to get a better chance to be admitted to good Catholic schools under the local education system. In accord with the Church's ancient custom, this motive should be purified (AG 13). Catechists would therefore have the responsibility to teach catechumens, regardless of their original motives, on the Church doctrines and beliefs, and most importantly, enabling them to live a Christian life and become true disciples of Christ their Teacher. Much similar to the Samaritans who believed in Jesus when they told the Samaritan woman, “It is no longer because of what you said that we believe, for we have heard for ourselves that this is truly the Savior of the world” (John 4:42), the converts’ motives should be purified so that on the day they (and their children) receive the sacraments of Christian initiation, they can profess that Jesus is their Savior and appreciate that the gift of becoming God’s children and a member of the Body of Christ is much more valuable than sending their children to a famous Catholic school. They should also come to realize that one of the primary purposes of studying in a Catholic school is to allow their children to receive eternal Christian values but not only temporal material gains. In this way, they can continue to develop their own and their children’s Christian life after Baptism and contribute voluntarily to missionary work in the spread of the Gospel and in the building up of the Church (AG 14).

        The ecumenical spirit should be nurtured in the neophytes, who should take into account that the brethren who believe in Christ are Christ's disciples, reborn in Baptism, sharers with the People of God in very many good things. As already mentioned above, Catholics should cooperate in a brotherly spirit with our separated brethren, making before other people a common profession of faith in God and in Jesus Christ, and cooperating in social and in technical projects as well as in cultural and religious ones, so that our lives together may become a more convincing witness for Christ among the non-believers (AG 15). After the neophytes have gathered into the People of God, it is important for all Christians to understand that we belong in one Community which is “a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, God’s own people” (1 Peter 2:9). In order to plant the Church and to make the Christian community grow, the ministry of priests should be duly fostered. In priestly training, students should be educated in the ecumenical spirit, and prepared for fraternal dialogue with other Christians and non-Christians. They should also learn to mediate between the traditions and religion of their homeland on the one hand and the Christian religion on the other. Paul said, “I have become all things to all people, that I might by all means save some” (1 Cor 9:22). For this purpose, priests should learn the history, aim, and method of the Church's missionary activity, and the special social, economic, and cultural conditions of their own people, so that they can better engage in ecumenical dialogues and collaborative projects with other Christians and non-Christians (AG 16).

        Again, the social media can play an important role in priestly work. For example, priests and students receiving priestly training can make effective use the Facebook to feature topics on papal and diocesan news, collaborative projects with other Christian communities, daily Biblical reflections, Saints of the day, catechisms as well as social subjects of local concern. Being pastors and teachers of faith, their social media posts should reveal the necessary virtues of priests: goodness of heart, sincerity, strength and constancy of mind, zealous pursuit of justice, affability, etc. (Presbyterorum Ordinis 3). In this way, lay Catholics who are Facebook friends of the priest can help to disseminate Christ message to their personal circle of friends by sharing on social media. Furthermore, sharing knowledge on religious subjects using the social media is not a monopoly of priests. Likewise, permanent deacons, the religious, catechists, professors in seminaries and universities, and theology students can make use of the social media to engage in ecumenical dialogues and in spreading Christian faith. As a theology student, I maintain a blog (vwklam.blogspot.hk) to share my doctrinal learnings and spiritual experiences with others through the blog and Facebook.

        Besides the missionary activities in the particular Churches, heavy emphasis has been placed on planning missionary activity at the universal Church level because it is the greatest and holiest task of the Church. The Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples is set up to direct and coordinate, throughout the world, both missionary work itself and missionary cooperation. In coordination with the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity, it aims at bringing about and directing fraternal cooperation as well as harmonious living with missionary undertaking of other Christian communities (AG 29). Through the dialogues between the competent experts from different Churches and Communities, everyone gains a truer knowledge and fairer appreciation of the teaching and religious life of the Churches and Communities (UR 4). When comparing doctrines with one another, Catholic theologians should remember that in Catholic doctrine there exists a "hierarchy" of truths, since they vary in their relation to the fundamental Christian faith. Thus the way will be opened by which through fraternal rivalry all will be stirred to a deeper understanding and a clearer presentation of the unfathomable riches of Christ (UR 11). Let’s continue to pray and strive at all levels of the Church in gradually overcoming the obstacles to perfect ecclesiastical communion, so that all Christians will at last, in a common celebration of the Eucharist, be gathered into the one and only Church in that unity which Christ bestowed on His Church from the beginning (UR 4). Together we will strengthen our missionary efforts in spreading the Gospel and building the Kingdom of God on earth.


Bibliography

"Christianity by Country." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, n.d. Web. 12 July 2014. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christianity_by_country>.
Coogan, Michael D. The New Oxford Annotated Bible: New Revised Standard Version with Apocrypha. N.p.: Oxford UP, 2010. Print.
Pope John Paul II. "Apostolic Letter The Rapid Development - Inter Mirifica." Vatican, n.d. Web. 1 June 2014. <http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/apost_letters/documents/hf_jp-ii_apl_20050124_il-rapido-sviluppo_en.html>.
Pope Paul VI. "Declaration on Religious Freedom - Dignitatis Humanae." Vatican, n.d. Web. 12 July 2014. <http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decl_19651207_dignitatis-humanae_en.html>.
Pope Paul VI. "Declaration on the Relation of the Church to Non-Christian Religions - Nostra Aetate." Vatican, n.d. Web. 12 July 2014. <http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decl_19651028_nostra-aetate_en.html>.
Pope Paul VI. "Decree concerning the Pastoral Office of Bishops - Christus Dominus." Vatican, n.d. Web. 01 June 2014. <http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decree_19651028_christus-dominus_en.html>.
Pope Paul VI. "Decree on Ecumenism - Unitatis Redintegratio." Vatican, n.d. Web. 12 July 2014. <http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decree_19641121_unitatis-redintegratio_en.html>.
Pope Paul VI. "Decree on Ministry and the Life Priests - Presbyterorum Ordinis." Vatican, n.d. Web. 01 June 2014. <http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decree_19651207_presbyterorum-ordinis_en.html>.
Pope Paul VI. "Decree on the Mission Activity of the Church - Ad Gentes." Vatican, n.d. Web. 12 July 2014. <http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decree_19651207_ad-gentes_en.html>.
Pope Paul VI. "Dogmatic Constitution on the Church - Lumen Gentium." Vatican, n.d. Web. 12 July 2014. <http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19641121_lumen-gentium_en.html>.
Pope Pius IX. "The Syllabus of Errors Condemned by Pius IX." Vatican, n.d. Web. 12 July 2014. <http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Pius09/p9syll.htm>.
"Rallying in Prayer for Hong Kong." Sunday Examiner. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 July 2014. <http://sundayex.catholic.org.hk/node/1423>.
Ratzinger, Joseph. Church, Ecumenism, and Politics: New Endeavors in Ecclesiology. San Francisco: Ignatius, 2008. Print.

Tuesday, July 29, 2014

The Orthodox Church from A Catholic Perspective

        The schism between the Roman Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church is conventionally dated 1054 when Cardinal Humbert and two legates of the pope placed a bull of excommunication upon the altar of the Church of Holy Wisdom at Constantinople (Ware 43), which divided the then majority of Christians into the former under the pope and the latter in the Byzantine Empire. The Orthodox Church latter expanded to other places in the world. At present, the Orthodox Church is composed of four “ancient” patriarchates of Constantinople, Alexandria, Antioch and Jerusalem which occupy a specific position for historical reasons. The head of these patriarchates bears the title of patriarch, with the Patriarch of Constantinople known as the “Ecumenical” Patriarch who ranks first in honor in the Orthodox Church (i.e., “first among equals”).[1] There are also ten other fully independent autocephalous churches with the biggest in Russia.[2] Some of the heads of these churches also bear the title of patriarch while others are either called archbishop or metropolitan. In addition, there are several “autonomous” churches which are self-governing in most respects but are not fully independent. Finally, there is a large Orthodox “diaspora” in Europe, North and South America, and Australia which are jurisdictionally belonging to one of the patriarchates or autocephalous churches, with some of them moving towards self-governance (Ware 5-6).

        The Orthodox Church is essentially a family of self-governing churches which are bound together not under a centralized hierarchy, but solely by the bond of unity in the faith and communion in the sacraments. Each patriarchate or autocephalous church, while independent, is in full agreement with the rest on all matters of doctrine and in full sacramental communion (Ware 7). 

        The unity of faith in the Orthodox Church can be summed up in the word “Tradition”, which means the rich inheritance received in the past, and their belief in transmitting this inheritance unimpaired to the future. Among the various components of Tradition, of the most importance are the Bible, the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed and the doctrinal definitions of the seven Ecumenical Councils,[3] which are considered something absolute and permanent. The other parts of the Tradition include writings of the Fathers, definitions by local councils, canons, service books and liturgical actions, holy icons, etc., which are not as equally important as the first three (Ware 196). Nevertheless, Tradition in the Orthodox Church is considered not static but dynamic. While inwardly unchangeable (for God does not change), it is constantly assuming new forms under the living discovery of the Holy Spirit, which supplement the old without changing them (Ware 198). Moreover, to an Orthodox Christian, doctrine cannot be understood unless it is prayed and lived. Faith and love, theology and life, are inseparable (Ware 206).

        The unity between Christ and His Church is effected above all through the sacraments. Of particular importance are Baptism where the new Christian is buried and raised with Christ; and the Eucharist where members of Christ’s Body, the Church, receive His Body in the sacrament, thereby creating unity of the Church. The other five sacraments,[4] though of lesser importance, are also a source of spiritual grace received through an outward visible sign (Ware 274-275).

        The Orthodox Church believes in the “one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church”, which is part of the Creed. As mentioned above, members of the Orthodox Church are united by the same faith and the sacrament of Communion (the Eucharist). Hughes Oliphant Old also said that “the Church really is so much as the actual celebration of the sacrament of Communion” (Old and Russell 233); while Letty M. Russell considered “the Church as a community of Christ, bought with a price, where everyone is welcome” (Old and Russell 241). While certainly there are similarities between the Orthodox way and the Old/Russell descriptions of the “one” Church, the difference lies primarily with the understanding of “communion” under the “one” Church. Orthodoxy rejects the concept of “inter-communion” between separated Christian bodies, and admits no form of sacramental fellowship short of full communion (Ware 310). From another perspective, the Orthodox Church considers itself to constitute the one true Church, even though it does not preclude other non-Orthodox Christians to possibly belong to the Church through an “invisible” bond (Ware 307).

        Orthodoxy teaches that every Christian, created in God’s image, must aim to “become god”, to attain theosis or “deification” (Ware 230). The process of deification should begin in the present life and not wait to the Last Day. Go to the church; receive sacraments regularly; pray to God in spirit and in truth; read the Gospel; and follow the commandments are ways for Christians to become god (Ware 236). Basically, Orthodoxy not only believes in an ideal, invisible and heavenly Church, but also the fact that this “ideal Church” exists visibly on earth as a concrete reality. This does not mean that Christians on earth do not sin and are perfect, but the Church on earth is a thing of heaven and cannot sin. There is no separation between the visible and invisible, between the Church militant and the Church triumphant, for the two make up a single and continuous reality, of which Christ is the head. This Church is the icon of the Trinity, the Body of Christ, and the fullness of the Spirit (Ware 242-243). Such an Orthodoxy understanding of the “holiness” of the Church, though in some way similar to the Old/Russell’s description in relation to the sanctification of the Church by the Holy Spirit, presents a significant difference on the latter’s view of the gradual transformation of the Church into the holy Church that God intends. According to Old/Russell, the visible Church on earth should cultivate humility and must strive for holiness, as none in this life can claim to have attained it (Old and Russell 238). Moreover, in Russell’s opinion, the intention of holiness extends far beyond the Church itself, for it is part of God’s purpose in mending creation by weaving creation together in a bond of love and connection with the margin of society (Old and Russell 245). And that we are living in the hope that one day (i.e., not at present) we shall be the Church that God intends (Old and Russell 254).

        As for the catholic mark in the Orthodox context, it basically refers to the unity of the orthodox faith in its family of sister churches headed by individual patriarchs, archbishops or metropolitans. Despite decentralized in structure, the separated communities of the Orthodox Church can be integrated into Orthodoxy without compromising their internal autonomy. Orthodoxy desires unity in diversity, not uniformity; harmony in freedom, not absorption; with all sharing the same faith and sacraments (Ware 309). On the other hand, besides referring to the orthodoxy of faith in Christ, which essentially means “the Word truly preached and the sacraments rightly administered” in the Protestant world, the understanding of catholicity for Old/Russell also refers to the universality of Christ’s presence in the whole world. And in interpreting the orthodoxy of faith, Old/Russell is not suggesting that the right doctrine is to be defined by those who rule over a particular community, but on the responsibility of churches in all parts of the world to live out a story of faith that witnesses to God’s love for the world. In other words, emphasis is put on the “right practice” than the “right belief” of the communities of the faithful as they seek to be connected to the world around them (Old and Russell 246). Having said that, the firm belief of the Orthodox Church that man, in both flesh and spirit, is created in the image of God (Louth 219) draws it closer to Russell’s point that the concern of the Church today is Christ’s presence among the poor, marginalized and outcast (which is universal) and stressing the importance of the Church as a sign of justice, since all men regardless of whether they are rich or poor, influential or unimportant, clever or idiotic, are made in His image.

        Orthodoxy insists upon the hierarchical structure of the Church, upon the apostolic succession, the episcopate, and the priesthood (Ware 239). Each local church is constituted by the faithful, gathered around their bishop and celebrating the Eucharist. The universal Orthodox Church is constituted by the communion of the heads of the local churches, i.e., the bishops, with one another, again by the celebration of the Eucharist (Ware 245). Obviously, the understanding of apostolicity of Old/Russell in the Protestant world is very different. The apostolic witness is understood in terms of the quality of life of those who continue to live out the biblical story of Christ and the apostles in their own time, rather than the passing on of ordination or commissioning of the apostles through each generation of leadership. According to Russell, the Church’s apostolic mark is the sign of participation in God’s mission: traditioning, sending, and liberating action in the world (Old and Russell 246), particularly among the underprivileged.

        Despite that the bishop of the Orthodox Church is the divinely appointed teacher of faith, the guardian of the faith is not the episcopate alone, but the whole people of God, i.e., bishops, clergy and laity together. In other words, all the people are stewards of the truth, but it is the bishop’s particular office to proclaim it. According to Orthodoxy, “infallibility” of the Church belongs to the whole Church, not just the episcopate in isolation (Ware 250). When this is compared to the Roman Catholic’s perspective, the role of the Church’s infallibility, as Roch Kereszty suggests, is to maintain the virginity of the Church to ensure that the integrity of the Church’s faith can never be fully separated from her immaculate, spotless holiness. According to Kereszty, it is the Marian character of the Church, i.e., resembling Mary in her faith in and love of God, to enable the Church to move ahead on her journey to holiness. The Magisterium, on the other hand, is an indispensable but not central truth of Catholic ecclesiology. It only serves as a necessary temporary means to protect and safeguard the virgin Church against adultery and corruption (Kereszty 389).

        Clearly the Orthodox Church also honors the Blessed Virgin Mary as the most exalted among God’s creatures. She is the Mother of God, Ever-Virgin and All-Holy (Ware 257). Certainly Mary serves as a perfect role model for Orthodox Christians to follow as well as a source of intercession in their process of deification. In this regard, the Marian character or the “virginity” of the Church is relevant to Orthodoxy as and when her members strive to safeguard the orthodox faith of the Church in resemblance to the Mother of God. Despite the existence in differences between the Roman Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church on the understanding of Church authority, particularly on the pope’s primacy over the Church as the Vicar of Christ, the precedence of the Marian character of the Church over her Petrine character (i.e., the hierarchical authority of the Church) is basically in agreement between the two in respect of the Church’s infallibility against error and corruption. This perhaps can draw us closer to full communion one day. Of course it needs the prayerful support of the whole Church, which ultimately is always the inspiration of any hope of unity (Ratzinger 89).


Bibliography
Coogan, Michael D. The New Oxford Annotated Bible: New Revised Standard Version with Apocrypha. N.p.: Oxford UP, 2010. Print.
Kereszty, Roch. "The Infallibility of the Church: a Marian Mystery". Communio: International Catholic Review 38 (Fall 2011): 374-390.
Louth, Andrew. Introducing Eastern Orthodox Theology. N.p.: n.p., n.d. Kindle file.
Old, Hughes Oliphant and Russell, Letty M. “Why Bother with Church? The Church and Its Worship”. In Essentials of Christian Theology edited by William C. Placher. Louisville, KY: Westminster/John Knox, 2003: 221-255.
Ratzinger, Joseph. Church, Ecumenism, and Politics: New Endeavors in Ecclesiology. San Francisco: Ignatius, 2008. Print.
Ware, Timothy. The Orthodox Church: Timothy Ware. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1963. Kindle file.



[1] Before the schism, the pope ranked first in honor.
[2] These are Russia, Serbia, Romania, Bulgaria, Georgia, Cyprus, Greece, Poland, Albania, and Czech Lands and Slovakia.
[3] These Ecumenical Councils coincides with the first seven Ecumenical Councils of the Roman Catholic Church.
[4] The seven sacraments of the Orthodox Church are largely the same as those of the Roman Catholic Church.