Saturday, March 8, 2014

Creation stories in Gensis

        The first reading of today (9 March 2014) is a creation story of Genesis. There are two distinct creation accounts in the book of Genesis. The first account, Gen 1:1-2:3, is a priestly account of creation. “God” is the creator. The second account, Gen 2:4-3:24 is from a Yahwist source. “YHWH” is the creator. This short paper compares and contrasts the two creation stories.

        In the priestly account of creation, there is an elaborated description of God’s creation of everything in the universe. Through a series of chronological creations, He made everything from nothing in “six days”. And everything that He made is good. The climax of God’s creation is the creation of human being, which was created after the creation of all other things. God said, “Let us make humankind in our image, according to our likeness … So God created humankind in his image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them” (Gen 1:26-27). Human being is created in God’s image and thus a statue of the deity on earth, different from all other creations. God blessed and said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply; and fill the earth and subdue it; and have dominion over … every living thing that moves upon the earth” (Gen 1:28). Clearly, mankind is given the responsibility to continue existence through sexual differentiation and designated as the ruler of God’s other creations on earth. God is very pleased with everything that He has created and to make it perfect, God finished the work and rested on the seventh day.

        The Yahwist source of creation, unlike the priestly account, makes no elaboration on God’s creation of the heavenly and earthly objects. After a short introduction, the Yahwist creation account puts focus on the Garden of Eden. Nevertheless, the highlight of creation is also on human being, i.e., same as the Priestly source. Again, mankind is different from the other things created by God, it was through God’s breath into his nostrils to animate the dust and make man a living being. God also gave man a partner, woman who is “his bones and flesh”, and they should become one flesh and multiply. Similar to the priestly account, God also made other creatures under man’s custody. The notable difference is the existence of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, whose fruit man shall not eat or touch, or otherwise he shall die. It sets the scene on human sin and suffering.

        By their free will, mankind chose to fall into temptation of the serpent’s words and eat the fruits of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil so that they might be like God. The consequences of sin are sufferings. The Yahwist source of creation contains several etiologies to explain why the things are the way they are. These etiologies echo the earlier creation stories of both the Priestly and Yahwist accounts. For example, man suddenly knew he was naked and became embarrassed – a sharp contrast with the situation in the priestly account – sexual desire is no longer as pure and sacred as it was originated. Man needed to work and sweat to live regardless of God’s putting all things under his control. Woman had to bear the pain on childbirth despite that it is a gift of God’s continuation of mankind. Man and woman are no longer partners and mutual helpers as the latter became subordinate to the former. The perfect order of things was disturbed, the crafty serpent was cursed so was the ground which would be filled with thorns and thistles. Most serious of all, death came to the earth, “you are dust, and to dust you shall return” (Gen 3:19). 

        In the Hebrew Bible, God’s creative power does not stop with the creation accounts in Genesis. It is the Israelite’s experience that through YHWH’s supreme power, a sinful world can be recreated and restored to a perfect world. The early story of Noah is an example. The description in Isaiah 65:17-25 on the prophecy of a new heaven and a new earth is another. “For I am about to create new heavens and a new earth; the former things shall not be remembered or come to mind … I am about to create Jerusalem as a joy, and its people as a delight … no more shall the sound of weeping be heard in it; or the cry of distress …” It resembles the orderly creation of God of the Garden in Eden where man shall enjoy the work of their hands and eat their produce; woman shall not suffer the pain for childbirth; and mankind shall live peacefully in a paradise with different animals, save for the serpent, like that in Genesis, shall be punished as “its food shall be dust”. The only exception is the mortality of man though he was expected to live a much longer life. It is not surprising to be so as resurrection from the dead is not yet a common Jewish belief at the time of Second Isaiah. In any event, the recreated world can be taken as the stage upon which God’s redemptive act to save His people.


Friday, March 7, 2014

The Canon of the New Testament

        The Canon of the New Testament comprises the four Gospels according to Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, the Acts of the Apostles, the 13 Pauline Epistles, the Epistle to the Hebrews, the Epistles of other Apostles, and the Book of Revelation. The recognition of the canonical status of several books in the New Testament is a long and gradual process. During the process, the occurrence of issues and heretics in the early Church, the citation from certain books by the early Church Fathers in their writings, and the public reading of Christian documents in Church services of divine worship had a profound effect on the selection of books for inclusion into the Canon. The influence of early Church Fathers also explains why the development of Canon differed between the West and the East and some other books outside today’s Canon enjoyed temporary and local authority. This paper summarizes the book “The Canon of the New Testament” written by Bruce M. Metzger, which provides an analysis on the various factors leading to the finalization of the Canon.

        The canonization process can be traced back to the “early Apostolic Fathers” who had personal knowledge of some of the apostles, but were not the apostles themselves. Their writings span the period from about 95 CE to 150 CE. These writings seldom make express citations from the New Testament (Metzger 39-40). The Epistle of Clement of Rome, written in around 95-96 CE, contains extensive quotations from the Old Testament. It seems that Clement might have knowledge on several Pauline Epistles but it is unsure on whether he had access to the Synoptic Gospels as he urged his readers to “remember the words of the Lord Jesus” and there are no exact parallels between his work and the Gospels. (40-43).

        Ignatius, the second bishop of Antioch, wrote seven epistles, which demonstrate great originality. The quotations in the epistles are few in number, brief in content and made primarily from memory. Nonetheless, one can still observe certain parallels between his epistles and several Pauline Epistles, and plausibly also Hebrews and 1 Peter. It is also possible that Ignatius was acquainted with the Gospels of Matthew and John (43-49).   Polycarp, bishop of Smyrna, had made the most quotations and reminiscences from the New Testament in his epistle among the early Apostolic Fathers. There are about 100 from the New Testament with only a dozen from the Old Testament. These include at least eight Pauline Epistles, the Epistle to the Hebrews, 1 Peter and 1 John. He also cited sayings of Jesus that can be found in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke. His extensive citations from the New Testament displayed respect for these apostolic writings which were lacking in other writings of his contemporaries (e.g., Ignatius) (59-63).

        One of the most famous books produced in the early Church was the Shepherd of Hermas, which was frequently quoted and for a time regarded as inspired. The book is characterized by its high moral value and had served as a textbook for early catechumens. Despite that no quotation is made from either the Old or New Testament, there are reminiscences from the Gospel of Matthew and John, and the Epistles of Ephesus and James (63-67). The various writings of the early Apostolic Fathers show that despite their knowledge on many of the New Testament books and epistles, they did not regard them as “Scriptures” and there is no conception of the duty of exact quotation from these books as they were yet in the full sense “canonical”. Nevertheless, there is an already implicit authority of such books, particularly in the words of Jesus, which would require to be preserved in a set of Christian writings (and not just oral transmissions as advocated by Papias[1]) so as to inspire confidence among the believers (72-73).

        Several issues in the early Church had bearings on ascertaining more exactly which books are authoritative in matters of faith and life. One of the major religious movements during the early Church period is Gnosticism, which is a syncretistic religion and philosophy that flourished for about four centuries alongside early Christianity[2]. While the Gnostics claimed that they were Christians and recognized some of the books adopted by the Church, they also had a number of “apocryphal” Gospels, such as the Gospel of Thomas and Gospel of Peter, and other texts in which the apostles report what the Lord had secretly communicated to them, particularly during the period between His resurrection and Ascension into heaven[3]. To counter the development of Gnosticism, the Church Fathers attacked the heresies and in doing so, helped to ascertain more clearly the books and epistles which conveyed the true teaching of the Lord, while rejecting those false sacred books. In this way, the early Church scrutinized those books which were in line with the expression of its faith for inclusion into the Canon (75-90).

        Another development which is of significance during the early Church period is Marcion, who was a respected member of the Christian community in the middle of the second century, but was later excommunicated because of his extreme views in the total rejection of the Old Testament[4]. To counter Marcion’s teaching, the Church began to consider more seriously the full set of books and epistles that conveyed truly the Word. One common criterion used was whether the book is in connection with one particular apostle[5]. The four Gospels recording the deeds and words of Christ formed the core and “opening collection” of the New Testament. The rest could be judged in light of this opening collection. In this regard, the Marcion’s heresy had accelerated the process of fixing the Canon of the New Testament (91-99).

        While the Marcion development had prompted the Church to recognize the full breath of authoritative writings, yet another development was Montanism that broke out in the second half of the second century, which claimed to be a Christian religion of the Holy Spirit marked by ecstatic outbursts. The Montanism development resulted in reactions from the Church which eventually cut off Montanists from communion. Nevertheless, the development also triggered deeper thoughts on whether and which books and epistles of an apocalyptic nature, including the Apocalypse, should be included in the Canon. As a result, the Church took the first step toward the adoption of a closed canon of Scripture (99-106).

        After the era of the early Apostolic Fathers, the four Gospels and the Pauline Epistles were widely accepted by the Church as authoritative Christian Scriptures. They were generally recognized as suitable to be read in public worships. By the close of the second century CE, lists began to be drawn up of these authoritative books (191). Among them the two most prominent are the Muratorian Canon which classified books under four different categories based on the level acceptance by the Church; and the Classification of the Church historian Eusebius who classified books into canonical (recognized) books, canonical (disputed) books, uncanonical (spurious) books and uncanonical (fictions of heretics) books (205). Interestingly enough, Eusebius included all the 27 books of the New Testament as canonical books (22 recognized and five disputed) and put the Apocalypse under two separate categories (canonical (recognized) and uncanonical (spurious)) to acknowledge the fact of the extravagant use of the book by the Montanists resulting in its rejection by some Christians. Eusebius did not name it the canon but a “catalogue” (Brown, Fitzmyer, Murphy 1035). Nonetheless, the closing of the Canon of the Hebrew Bible by the Jews in the second century, consciously or unconsciously, provided a model to prompt the exclusive selection of sacred Christian books on Jesus which were authoritative and divine (Souter 149).

        The process of development and closing of this “New Testament Canon” differs between the Eastern and Western churches. In the East, there was considerable doubt concerning the authority of the most of the Catholic Epistles. For example, Clement of Alexandria (150-215 CE), a representative figure of the Eastern Church, cited extensively from the books of the New Testament except Philemon, James, 2 Peter, and 2 and 3 John (131). Origen, another authoritative figure of the East in the third century, regarded the canon of the four Gospels as closed, and accepted the 14 Pauline Epistles (including Hebrew), Acts, 1 Peter, 1 John, Jude and Revelation, but expressed reservation on James, 2 Peter, 2 and 3 John (141). The situation remained until Athanasius, Bishop of Alexandria wrote an Easter Letter in 367 CE to declare that all the 27 books of the New Testament were fountains of salvation and only in these alone the teaching of godliness was proclaimed. It marks the first time that the scope of the New Testament is declared to be exactly the 27 books accepted today as canonical (210-212). Yet, as discussed below, not all the churches in the East readily accepted the opinion of Athanasius.

        The churches of Eastern Syria composed the “Diatessaron” in the second half of the second century CE, in which the four Gospels were woven together into a single Gospel (114). It was in widespread use in Syria until the early 5th century. After then, the four Gospels were “revived”, and together with the Acts, the Pauline Epistles, Epistle of the Hebrew and the three longer Catholic Epistles (James, 1 Peter and 1 John), formed 22 writings of the Syrian New Testament (Peshitta), which is still in use today as the official lectionary of the Syrian Orthodox Church and the Chaldean Syrian Church. The four shorter Catholic Epistles (2 Peter, 2 and 3 John and Jude) and the Revelation are excluded (220). For the Armenian Church, while its New Testament contains all the 27 canonical books, an apocryphal Third Epistle of Paul to the Corinthians[6] is included in the appendix. In the Coptic Church, although the Epistles of Clement are outside the Canon, they may nevertheless be read. As for the Ethiopian Church, there is a “wider canon” which includes 35 books[7], i.e., eight additional books on top of the 27 canonical books in the New Testament (218-228).

        Unlike the East, the Latin Church generally felt that there was a need for a sharp delineation with regard to the Canon (229). Since the middle of the second century CE, various Christian writers of the West, notably Justin Martyr, Hippolytus, Irenaeus, Tertullian and Cyprian of Carthage quoted from the books of the New Testament and regarded them as Scriptures. In Irenaeus’ work “Against the Heresies”, he had a closed canon of four Gospels; he also put the Pauline Epistles on par with the Gospels, though the canon for the epistles was not yet closed. For the apocalypses, he had the Apocalypse of John and the Shepherd of Hermas[8] in his canon. Irenaeus may be the first to use the title “New Testament” of a collection of books (Lienhard 27). Two men in the West, Jerome and Augustine, call for special remark in their contribution to closing the Canon. Jerome is famous for his revision of the competing Latin translations of the New Testament. He delivered the Gospels to Pope Damasus in 384 CE. Jerome’s New Testament contained the 27 books that we currently use, which generally became the books accepted by the Western Church. Nevertheless, he occasionally cast doubts on a few books, for example, in the case of 2 and 3 John, Jerome reported that they “are said to be the work of John the presbyter” (and not John the apostle). He also considered the Epistle of Barnabas[9] “almost if not quite” a New Testament book and the Shepherd of Hermas a useful book that many ancient writers quote from it as authority. Nonetheless, they were not included in the Latin Vulgate (234-236).

        Augustine’s influence upon the Western Church was even greater than that of Jerome. It was Augustine who, in three provincial synods in Hippo (393 CE), Carthage (397 CE and 419 CE), said that, “Besides the canonical Scriptures, nothing shall be read in the church under the name of the divine Scriptures”. He followed with the enumeration of the canonical Scriptures including all the 27 New Testament books[10], which has become the divine word throughout the Western Church (236-238). From then on, the Canon of the Western Church was more or less fixed except for the presence of the Epistle of Paul to the Laodiceans[11] in some manuscripts of the Latin Vulgate. It was not until the Council of the Florence (1439-43 CE) that the Pope cast his opinion of the Canon. For the New Testament, it was confirmed to be exactly the same 27 canonical books. One century later, due to the disrupting influences of opinions about the Scriptures expressed by Protestant Reformers, Pope Paul III convened the Council of Trent to consider moral and administrative reforms required in the Roman Catholic Church. On 8 April 1546, the Council issued a decree to the effect that the Canon of the Bible in our present form is a matter of faith:

“… following the example of the orthodox Fathers receives and venerates all the books of the Old and New Testament … and also the traditions pertaining to faith and conduct … with an equal sense of devotion and reverence … If, however, anyone does not receive these books in their entirety, with all their parts … as sacred and canonical, and knowingly and deliberately rejects the aforesaid traditions, let him be Anathema”.

This dogmatic proclamation at the Council of Trent essentially ended disputes about the Canon in the Roman Catholic Church (239-247). Since then, the Church has undoubtedly acknowledged the 27 sacred books in the New Testament as the inspired word of God, having a regulating value for faith and morals (Brown, Fitzmyer, Murphy 1035).

Bibliography

Brown, Raymond Edward. An Introduction to the New Testament. New Haven, CT: Yale UP, 2007. Print (on the bibliography at the end of Chapter 1).
Brown, Raymond Edward., Joseph A. Fitzmyer, and Roland E. Murphy. The New Jerome Biblical Commentary. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1990. Print.
Metzger, Bruce M. The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origin, Development, and Significance. Oxford: Clarendon, 1987. Print.
Lienhard, Joseph T. The Bible, the Church, and Authority: The Canon of the Christian Bible in History and Theology. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical, 1995. Print.
Souter, Alexander. The Text and Canon of the New Testament. London: Duckworth, 1954. Print.




[1] Papias is a representative figure of the early oral traditions. According to tradition, he had heard the preaching of John the apostle and was a friend of Polycarp.
[2] Its teaching is on the realization of Gnosis for the salvation of souls from their temporarily imprisoned physical bodies, so that the souls may return to God.
[3] These apocryphal gospels, despite preserving scraps of independent tradition, are inferior theologically to the four canonical Gospels and may even constitute a doctrinal danger (Brown, Fritmyer, Murphy 1044).
[4] According to Marcion’s teaching, only the Gospel according to Luke and ten Pauline Epistles could be accepted as authoritative. Even then, parts of these books and epistles, e.g., the first four chapters of Luke and some portions concerning the Jews and Old Testaments were removed by Marcion.
[5] The canonicity of Hebrew and Revelation was debated preciously because it was doubted whether they were written by Paul and John respectively (Brown, Fitzmyer, Murphy 1044).
[6] The Third Epistle of Paul to the Corinthians is part of the composite Acts of Paul, which is also an apocryphal that makes arbitrary use of the canonical Acts and the Pauline Epistles in a legendary manner (Metzger 174-176).
[7] The four Gospels, Acts, the seven Catholic Epistles, the fourteen Epistles of Paul (including Hebrew), the Book of Revelation, Sindos (four sections), Clement, The Book of the Covenant (two sections) and Didascalia.
[8] The Shepherd of Hermas was used as Scripture by Irenaeus, Tertullian, Clement of Alexandria and Origen. The Muratorian Canon classified it as a work that might be read but not proclaimed as Scripture in church (Metzger 188).
[9] The Epistle of Barnabas was for a time on the fringe of the Canon. Clement of Alexandria wrote a commentary on it and Origen called it “catholic”, a term he used for 1 Peter and 1 John. It stands after the New Testament in the forth-century codex Sinaiticus of the Greek Bible (Metzger 188).
[10] The order of the New Testament books is the Gospels, Acts, Pauline Epistles (including Hebrew), 1 and 2 Peter, 1, 2 and 3 John, James, Jude and the Revelation.
[11] The Epistle of the Laodiceans is a patchwork of phrases and sentences plagiarized from the canonical Pauline Epistles, particularly from Philippians (Metzger 183).

The Jewish Scriptures in the Christian Bible

        Both the New and Old Testaments are the authentic Word of God. The Christian Bible is thus composed of two Testaments and not just the New Testament. The two Testaments have dialectical relationships between them.

“God, the inspirer and author of both Testaments, wisely arranged that the New Testament be hidden in the Old and the Old be made manifest in the New. For, though Christ established the new covenant in His blood, still the books of the Old Testament with all their parts, caught up into the proclamation of the Gospel, acquire and show forth their full meaning in the New Testament and in turn shed light on it and explain it” (Dei Verbum #16).

As followers of Jesus, it is therefore necessary for Christians to understand the deeper meaning of the inspired biblical texts when Jesus and the authors of the New Testament make use to the Old Testament in their teachings. This will enable us to gain a better comprehension on the plans of God in the overall scheme of things, from His creation of mankind out of love and establishment of a covenant with them to the liberation of the Israelites who are His chosen people in the Old Testament; and from His only begotten Son’s undergoing the paschal mystery for the salvation of the entire human race to the sanctifying of the Church by the Holy Spirit to continue with the work of Jesus until the end of time when there is a final and definite fulfillment of God’s plans for mankind.

        This paper describes of the use of the Old Testament by Jesus and by the authors of the New Testament. The shared fundamental themes of the two Testaments as pointed out in "The Jewish People and Their Sacred Scriptures in the Christian Bible" of The Pontifical Biblical Commission will be used as the basis of the discussions. References are made primarily to the biblical passages in the New Testament. Where relevant, a re-reading of the related biblical passages in the Old Testament will also be made to illustrate how they acquire a fuller and deeper meaning as manifested by the teachings of Jesus and the authors of the New Testament.

        Revelation of God. Both Testaments share the theme that the one and only God, who is our creator and providence, speaks and reveals Himself to mankind, primarily through prophets in the Old Testament, and through Jesus in the New Testament, who is the word of God and our savior. Right from the beginning of the Gospel of John, the biblical author wrote:

“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things come into being through him, and without him not one thing came into being. What was come into being in him was life, and the life was the light of all people. The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not overcome it” (Jn 1:1-5).

It recalls God’s creation in Genesis: “In the beginning when God created the heavens and earth” (Gen 1:1) when He created all things through His Word. John identifies the Word as Jesus when he elaborates him as “the light of the world” (Jn 8:12) and the “the way and the truth and the life” (Jn 14:6). His introduction of the Word also sheds light on God’s Wisdom in the Old Testament: “She is more beautiful than the sun, and excels every constellation of the stars. Compared with the light she is found to be superior, for it is succeeded by the night, but against wisdom evil does not prevail” (Wis 7:29-30). Sin simply cannot prevail over Wisdom. On this point, John goes beyond the formulations of the Wisdom tradition, which has never suggested that Wisdom can be in any form equal to God.

        In his preaching, Jesus frequently appeals to his followers that they should trust in God, who is our Father in Heaven, “… so that you may be children of your Father in heaven; for he makes the sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous” (Mt 5:45). In the Old Testament, mankind is created in the image of God, “So God created humankind in his image, in the image of God he created them” (Gen 1:27). Jesus furthers the message of the Old Testament and tells us that we are not only created in God’s image, but can actually become his sons. He has also used an example of the riches of King Solomon to illustrate this point:

“Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow; they neither toil nor spin, yet I tell you, even Solomon in all this glory was not clothed like one of these … do not worry, What will we wear? … Indeed your heavenly Father knows that you need all these things. But strive first for the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be given to you as well” (Mt 6:28-33).

As our Father, God has given us all our necessities for life and what we need to strive for is the Kingdom of God and His righteousness. Adoptive sonship is also a theme in the letters of Paul, “When we cry, Abba! Father! It is the very Spirit bearing witness with our spirit that we are children of God, and if children, then heirs, heirs of God and joint heirs with Christ” (Rm 8:15-16). It denotes that Christians have become members of God’s family and have obtained a status – not as a slave but as a son and heir of God. The relationship between God and man has been drawn even closer than that in the Old Testament where the Israelites are called the holy people and nation of God. The New Testament brings out a deeper understanding on the intention of God’s creation of man.

        The Human Person. As the image of God, every human being, including the pagan, is attracted towards God. On the other hand, because of our sins, we have to face pain and death and thus human wretchedness is also a common theme in both Testaments. Prior to the commencement of his public mission, Jesus was tested in the wilderness by Satan (Mt 4:1-11). The forty days of fasting of Jesus recalls the testing of the Israelites in the wilderness (Ex 34:28) where they began to worship the golden calf after waiting Moses for forty days and nights. Their infidelity reflects human weaknesses. On the contrary, Jesus makes use of his own temptation to preach his followers that God is our rock and our fortress. All the responses made by Jesus to Satan are taken from the Old Testament: Deut 8:3 on man living not by bread alone but by God’s words; Ps 91:11-12 on the angels protecting him to avoid dashing his foot against a stone; Deut 6:16 on not putting the Lord your God to the test; and Deut 6:13 on serving the Lord your God alone. Jesus sends out a clear message that man should seek for the true riches coming out from the mouth of God and not the material riches of the world. Indeed, it is hunger for the word of God that draws the crowds first to John the Baptist and then to Jesus.

        Nonetheless, the wretched state of the human person continues to appear in various ways in the New Testament. Unlike the physical and mental misery of the Jewish people in the Babylonian Exile, moral misery is the focus of attention in the New Testament. In his contention with the Pharisees, Jesus challenges the Pharisees and claims that oral traditions such as hand-washing regulations are in effect replacing the law of God with merely human tradition. He cites from the book of Isaiah, “Because these people draw near with their mouths and honor me with their lips, while their hearts are far from me, and their worship of me is a human commandment learned by rote” (Isa 29:13). Essentially, he is saying that the Pharisees are only paying a lip service without turning their hearts to God. Worse still, as leaders among the Jewish people, they are mandating rules and regulations to the ordinary people which are not according to God’s will. Jesus said to them:

“Do you not see that whatever goes into a person from outside cannot defile … It is what comes out of a person that defiles. For it is from within, from the human heart, that evil intentions come: fornication, theft, murder, adultery, avarice, wickedness, deceit, licentiousness, envy, slander, pride, folly” (Mk 7:18-22).

The passion of Jesus pushes the moral wretchedness of the human nature to the extreme. Most if not all of the evil intentions emerge: envy, betrayal, denial, unjust trial, insults and mockery, and wickedness to the extreme resulting in the murder of Jesus on the cross.

        In the Letter of Paul to the Romans, he teaches that both Jews and Gentiles are under the power of sin by making use of a long series of quotes from the Old Testament in the letter (Rm 3:10-18). The citations from Psalms, Proverbs and Isaiah insist that no one may claim to satisfy God’s standards. Paul furthers his claim on the human limitation: “I can will what is right, but I cannot do it. For I do not do the good I want, but the evil I do not want is what I do” (Rm 7:19). “Wretched man that I am! Who will rescue me from this body of death” (Rm 7:24). The obvious answer is through Jesus Christ our Lord. In this way, Paul reinforces the believers’ understanding that God’s liberation and salvation as initially revealed in the Old Testament can only be substantially fulfilled in Jesus.

        God, Liberator and Savior. Both Testaments share the theme that God is the liberator and savior. In the Old Testament, the Israelites already experienced the salvation of God who delivered them from the hands of the Egyptians. The Babylonian Exile furthered their experience and understanding on God’s salvific plan and created a messianic hope among the people. In the New Testament, Mary praises the Lord as her savior, “My soul magnifies the Lord, and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior” (Lk 1:46-47). The name Jesus means "God saves". The beginning of the Gospel of Matthew reveals the mission of Jesus, “She will bear a son, and you are to name him Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins” (Mt 1:21). Matthew further points out that this is to fulfill what has been spoken by God through the prophet Isaiah, “Look, the young woman is with child and shall bear a son, and shall name him Immanuel” (Isa 7:14).

        In Jesus’ public mission, his power and authority to save manifest not only on the spiritual arena but also the physical. He cures sick people, opens the eyes of the blind, makes the lame walk and even sends the dead back to life. He promulgates the coming of the Kingdom of God through his deeds and words. When John the Baptist sent his disciples to ask Jesus whether he is “the one who is to come”, Jesus refers them to two passages from the Old Testament, “The eyes of the blind shall be opened, and the ears of the deaf unstopped; the lame shall leap like a deer, and the tongue of the speechless sing for joy” (Isa 35:5-6). “The spirit of the Lord God is upon me … he has sent me to bring good news to the oppressed” (Isa 61:1). These are the deeds that are predicted of the Messiah in the Old Testament. Jesus has used similar biblical passages from the Old Testament in his preaching to the people in the synagogue of Nazareth. And added at the end, “Today this scripture has been fulfilled in your hearing” (Lk 4:21). Unfortunately, the people are still full of doubts.

        Jesus opens the salvation of mankind to other nations. In his encounters with the Samaritan woman, he said to her initially, “You worship what you do not know; we worship what we know, for salvation is from the Jews” (Jn 4:22). But the time has come when “the true worshippers will worship the Father in spirit and truth” (Jn 4:23). Eventually, because of the woman’s testimony, many Samaritans come to Jesus, hear what he said, and believe in him. They said to the woman, “It is no longer because of what you said that we believe, for we have heard for ourselves, and we know that this is truly the Savior of the world” (Jn 4:42). In Paul’s letter to the Romans, he adopts the analogy that the Gentiles are the “wild olive shoot” which were grafted in place of some of the branches that were broken off from the olive tree.

        Above all, the title Savior is attributed to Jesus on his resurrection from the dead. Speaking before the high priest, Peter boldly said, “The God of our ancestors raised up Jesus, whom you had killed by hanging him on a tree. God exalted him at his right hand as Leader and Savior that he might give repentance to Israel and forgiveness of sins” (Ac 5:30-31). The Jewish people were expecting a national and political savior but Jesus is a savior of another kind. Through his paschal mystery, he brings about salvation not only to the Jews, but to the nations. The hope of salvation, which is expressed so frequently and forcefully in the Old Testament, finds its fulfilment in the New. But the actual realization, with the Savior dying on the cross for the redemption of man’s sins, is beyond the imagination of most of the contemporaries of Jesus. As Paul wrote to the Corinthians, “but we proclaim Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews and foolishness to Gentiles, but to those who are the called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God” (1 Cor 1:23-24).

        The Covenant. God established a covenant with the Israelites at different times in the Old Testament, notably His Promise to Abraham, the Sinai Covenant and the Davidic Promise. In the New Testament, the theme of covenant with His people is the fulfillment of God’s promises in the Old Testament through Jesus Christ. Despite that the new covenant is building on the old in terms of the relationship between God and mankind as well as the promises for an ideal world with no more sins and sufferings, there are also break points between the old and the new in terms of the institutions to maintain the relationship with God and the ways to achieve the eventual goals. In the New Testament, the covenant is established on a new foundation, the person and work of Jesus. Peter quotes from Ps 118:22 and he said to the Jewish leaders, “This Jesus is the stone that was rejected by you, the builders; it has become the cornerstone” (Ac 4:11). The “cornerstone” referred by Peter enables the book of Isaiah to acquire a deeper meaning, “See, I am laying in Zion a foundation stone, a tested stone, a precious cornerstone, a sure foundation: One who trusts will not panic” (Isa 28:16). God’s promise of security for Jerusalem and the house of David will be realized in Jesus Christ. Through him, the covenant relationship is deepened and broadened, and opened to all through Christian faith.

        At the last supper, Jesus took a cup, after giving thanks, he gave it to his disciples saying, “Drink from it, all of you; for this is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins” (Mt 26:27). The blood of Jesus where he shed on the cross thus becomes the foundation of the new covenant. The blood as a covenant recalls the scene of Moses doing and saying to the Israelites at Mount Sinai, “Moses took the blood and dashed it on the people, and said, ‘See the blood of the covenant that the Lord has made with you in accordance with all these words’” (Ex 24:8). In this sense, the new covenant also suggests continuity with the Sinai Covenant. Of course, its meaning is much deeper as the sacrifices in the Old Testament are animals while that in the New Testament is the “Lamb of God” as John the Baptist declares, “Here is the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world” (Jn 1:29). By virtue of Jesus’ offering himself as the eventual sacrifice of the Lamb of God, Christians can approach God through grace with Jesus as the mediator and by living a life of self-giving.

        Paul also mentions the new covenant in his letters by repeating Jesus’ words in the last supper (1 Cor 12:25). Referring to the Abrahamic Promise, Paul said that Christians become descendants of Abraham not by blood relation, but by their faith in Christ, “it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as descendants” (Rm 9:8). Moreover, Paul associates his apostolic ministry with the new covenant, “Not that we are competent of ourselves to claim anything as coming from us; our competence is from God, who has made us competent to be ministers of a new covenant, not of letter but of spirit; for the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life” (2 Cor 3:5-6). This echoes the “new covenant” in the book of Jeremiah:

“The days are certainly coming, says the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and Judah. It will not be like the covenant that I made with their ancestors when I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt – a covenant that they broke … I will put my law within them, and I will write it on their hearts; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people … for I will forgive their iniquity, and remember their sin no more” (Jer 31:31-34).

The new covenant prophesied by Jeremiah is inaugurated by the blood of Jesus. God’s promise in the Old Testament is definitive and cannot be abolished. The covenant announced in the Old Testament is fulfilled, not simply as a renewal of the Sinai covenant, but by the establishment of a covenant that is truly new, founded on Jesus offering himself as a sacrifice for the redemption of our sins. Through this new covenant, God will “forgive our iniquity, and remember our sin no more”.

        The Law. The Law is center to the Jewish scriptures and in their religious practice from the days of the Old Testament to the present age. In the New Testament, Jesus makes it clear that he comes not to abolish the law but to fulfill it. In Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount, he said, “Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth pass away, not one letter, not one stroke of a letter, will pass from the law until all is accomplished” (Mt 5:17-18).

        While Jesus affirms the validity of the law, he also gives it a new interpretation and dimension in the Sermon on the Mount. “You shall not murder” in Ex 20:13 is extended a much higher level of conduct and ethics, “if you are angry with a brother or sister, you will be liable to judgment; and if insult a brother or sister, you will be liable to the council; and if you say, ‘You fool’, you will be liable to hell” (Mt 5:22). On “You shall commit adultery” in Ex 20:14, Jesus extends the commandment to not only forbidding adultery with another person’s wife or husband, but also demanding his followers to maintain purity of heart, “everyone who looks at a woman with lust has already committed adultery with her in his heart” (Mt 5:28). On the command to love your neighbor in Lev 19:18, Jesus preaches us to love our enemies, “Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be children of your Father in heaven; for he makes the sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the righteous and on the unrighteous” (Mt 5:44-45). When Jesus is questioned by a lawyer on the greatest commandment in the law, he gives a concise reply from Deut 6:5 and Lev 19:8, “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul and with all your mind. This is the greatest and first commandment. And a second is like it: You shall love your neighbor as yourself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets” (Mt 23:37-39).

        Paul struggles with the role of the law in his letters for the obvious question on whether the Gentile believers would need to follow the Jewish laws. On the one hand, he acknowledges that the law is holy and good, “So the law is holy, and the commandment is holy and just and good” (Rm 7:12). But he also appreciates that the Law of the Old Testament cannot deliver him from the power of evil and sins, “I can will what is right, but I cannot do it. For I do not do the good I want, but the evil I do not want is what I do. Now if I do what I do not want, it is no longer I that do it, but sin that dwells within me” (Rm 8:19-20). In Paul’s view, Israel did strive for righteousness in fulfilling the law, but the people only approached the law on the basis of works, and thus they did not succeed in fulfilling the law. The only way to fulfill the law is to attain righteousness through faith in Christ, which is the regime of grace, “sin will have no dominion over you, since you are not under law but under grace” (Rm 6:14). Paul also wrote, “For Christ is the end of the laws so that there may be righteousness for everyone who believes” (Rm 10:4). On cursory reading, it could mean that Jesus has terminated or abolished the law, but a deeper sense is that Jesus is not only the goal (end) of the law, but acting in righteousness through faith in him shall be the way to fulfill the law.

        Indeed, Jesus has personally taught his disciples a new dimension of the law at the last supper, “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another” (Jn 13:34-35). After having the last supper, Jesus undergoes the paschal mystery with a complete sacrifice on the cross, demonstrating his love for mankind to the extent of surrendering his life. The precept of love in the light of Jesus’ example of self-sacrifice has given the law a new interpretation. With this new commandment, the law is fulfilled.

        Prayer and Cult. In the Old Testament, the Israelites maintained their relationship and communications with God with prayer and cult. The Temple in Jerusalem was the center of the Jewish worship. In the New Testament, Jesus attaches great importance to prayer himself. He prays often to the Father and teaches his followers to pray to Him. No doubt the Lord’s Prayer (Mt 6:9-13) is an original invention of Jesus for the benefit of his disciples, there are nevertheless many Old Testament references that make up its various themes.

        “Our Father in heaven, hallowed be your name”: a reference is found in the book of Ezekiel on the Lord’s saying to Israel on sanctification of His name, “I will sanctify my great name, which has been profaned among the nations, and which you have profaned among them; and the nations shall know that I am the Lord” (Ezek 36:23). By appealing to his disciples to sanctify the holy name of God, Jesus is in effect also asking them to spread the good news to the rest of the world. “Your kingdom come”: a reference is found in Mic 4:1-8 on the ideal age when “many nations shall come and say: Come, let us go up to the mountain of the Lord … they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks … The lame I will make the remnant and those who were cast off, a strong nation”. The Lord said, “the former dominion (kingdom) shall come, the sovereignty of daughter Jerusalem”. Jesus is inviting us to pray for the arrival of the ideal Kingdom of God to earth, i.e. yearning for eschatological salvation by complying with God’s will, “Your will be done, on earth as it is in heaven”.

        On our daily necessity, Jesus teaches us to say, “Give us this day our daily bread”: a reference is found in Proverbs, “give me neither poverty nor riches; feed me with the food that I need” (Prov 30:8). God will take care of our daily needs and we should not ask for more than what we actually need. “And forgive us our debts, as we also have forgiven our debtors”: a reference can be found in the Sabbath Year in Deut 15:1-18, which is the year for granting a remission of debts. “Debts” can be extended spiritually to sins, where Jesus is asking us to imitate God the Father who is always merciful on His forgiveness of people who has sinned against Him. In fact, we are all sinners and Jesus tells us that he would welcome all sinners to repent, “I have come to call not the righteous but sinners to repentance” (Lk 5:32). “And do not bring us to the time of trial”. It refers to a desire to escape from the “fearful day of the Lord”, symbolizing great distress and pain. Allusions can be found in Jer 30:7, Isa 13:6 and Joel 2. “But rescues us from the evil one”: a reference is found in Psalms, “The Lord loves those who hate evil; he guards the lives of his faithful; he rescues them from the hand of the wicked” (Ps 97:10). When it is read in conjunction with the previous phrase, Jesus is asking us to pray for resistance to the temptation of Satan so as to escape from the dreadful punishment of the Lord. He did it by example during his own trial at Gethsemane before he was handed over to be crucified. The different themes come perfectly together as an ideal prayer to God the Father.

        In his Letter to the Thessalonians, Paul invites Christians to pray incessantly to God, “Rejoice always, pray without ceasing, give thanks in all circumstances; for this is the will of God in Christ Jesus for you” (1 Thess 5:17), which echoes Jesus’ teaching in Mt 7:7-11, “Ask, and it will be given you; search and you will find; knock, and the door will be opened for you …”. At the end of the Sermon, Jesus concludes with the “Golden Rule”, “In everything do to others as you would have them do to you; for this is the law and the prophets” (Mt 7:12), which is a useful summary of Jesus’ ethical teaching to his contemporaries (by referring explicitly to the law and prophets) and to all Christians.

        As for cult, Jesus makes use of Hos 6:6: “For I desire steadfast love and not sacrifice” to tell the people that he is the “Lord of the Sabbath”, i.e. his authority exceeds even that of divinely established institutions. He preaches that acts of mercy outweigh ritual observations in God’s eyes, “But if you had known what this means, ‘I desire mercy and not sacrifice,’ you would not have condemned the guiltless. For the Son of Man is lord of the Sabbath” (Mt 12:7-8). As Jeremiah had prophesied the destruction of the first temple, Jesus predicted the destruction of the second temple but pre-announced that it would be replaced by a new temple, his risen body in three days (c.f. Mt 24:1-2, Jn 2:13-22). Paul tells the believers that they are members of Christ’s body and their own bodies become the “temple” of the Holy Spirit, “Do you not know that you are God’s temple and that God’s Spirit dwells in you? If anyone destroys God’s temple, God will destroy that person. For God’s temple is holy, and you are that temple” (1 Cor 3:17). With the paschal mystery, the animal sacrifices in the Old Testament were invalidated and the only efficacious sacrifice remains is the personal offering of Christ as the High Priest, “since we have confidence to enter the sanctuary by the blood of Jesus, by the new and living way that he opened for us through the curtain (that is, through his flesh)” (Heb 10:19-20). And as Christians, we can unite with Christ in the offering to God, “I appeal to you therefore, brothers and sisters, by the mercies of God, to present your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God, which is your spiritual worship” (Rm 12:1).

        Divine Reproaches and Condemnations. The election of Israel as God’s holy nation resulted in demands for faithfulness and holiness. But the unfaithful people in the Old Testament entailed reproaches and even condemnations by the prophets – the messengers of God. In the Gospel, John the Baptist resembles the harsh warnings of the Old Testament prophets to rebuke the Pharisees and Sadducees who come for baptism, he said to them, “You brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the wrath to come? Bear fruit worthy of repentance” (Mt 3:7-8). On the inauguration of Jesus’ ministry, he also calls for repentance, and emphasizes on its urgency, “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven has come near” (Mt 4:17). However, he is shocked with the people’s disbelief, and announces a judgment that is even more severe than that of Sodom, the example of an evil and unrepentant city in the Old Testament (Gen 19:1-29). He said, “But I tell you on the day of judgment it will be more tolerable for the land of Sodom than for you” (Mt 11:24).

        Jesus also tells the parable of the vineyard (Mt 21:31-41) to allude to the rejection of himself as the Son of God by the Jewish people and prophesize his own death. He makes use of the familiar metaphor of a vineyard which is frequently adopted by Old Testament prophets. The denial of Jesus’ proclamation of the Kingdom of God by the Jewish leaders eventually leads to his crucifixion. Despite this, Peter continues with the appeal for repentance, he said to the people:

“you rejected the Holy and Righteous One and asked to have a murderer given to you … I know that you acted in ignorance, as did also your rulers. In this way God fulfilled what he had foretold through all the prophets, that his Messiah would suffer. Repent therefore, and turn to God so that your sins may be wiped out” (Ac 14-19).

Indeed, the necessity that the Messiah would suffer was foretold by Second Isaiah in the fourth Servant Song, “… although he had done no violence, and there was no deceit in his mouth. Yet it was the will of the Lord to crush him with pain … he bore the sin of many and made intercession for the transgressors” (Isa 52:13-53:12). Among the Christian communities, reproaches though to a much lesser extent than the Old Testament, are still there for those who turn away from God. Nonetheless, the Church incessantly appeals to their conversion and repent under the guidance of the Holy Spirit. This is in full accord with Jesus’ teaching that he comes to call sinners, not the righteous.

        The Promises. The promises made by God in the Old Testament are re-read in the light of Jesus in the New Testament. God’s salvific plan is substantially fulfilled with the paschal mystery of Jesus. However, His plans for mankind have not ended with Jesus’ glorious ascension into heaven. Jesus instituted the Church which continues with his mission on earth until the end of time when there is a final salvation and restoration. Peter said, “Jesus, who must remain in heaven until the time of universal restoration that God announced long ago through his holy prophets” (Ac 3:21). He elaborates that Jesus is the successor of Moses as well as David to convince the people that Jesus is the Messiah as promised by God. Thousands of people believed and were baptized.

        Matthew frequently speaks of the “Kingdom of Heaven” in the Gospel. He recognizes Jesus as the Messiah through his teaching and healing, casting out demons and even raising the dead to life. In the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus preaches the crowd on what they should do to enter the kingdom of heaven. Focusing on deeds without love is simply insufficient, he said, “For I tell you, unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes of Pharisees, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven” (Mt 5:21). The parables told by Jesus present a view that the Kingdom of Heaven has come and will continue to grow, “The kingdom of heaven is like a mustard seed that someone took and sowed in his field; it is the smallest of all the seeds, but when it has grown it is the greatest of shrubs and becomes a tree” (Mt 13:31-32). Some other parables have an eschatological dimension, “the kingdom of heaven is like a net that was thrown into the sea and caught fish of every kind; when it was full, they drew it ashore, sat down, and put the good into baskets but threw out the bad” (Mt 13:47). The parables on the Kingdom of Heaven echo and provide an extended meaning to the prophecies of Daniel, “The kingship and dominion and the greatness of the kingdoms under the whole heaven shall be given to the people of the holy ones” (Dan 8:27), “many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt” (Dan 12:2). As the earthly head of the Church, Peter and his successors receive the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven from Jesus, “I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven” (Mt 16:19).

        With the Church continuing with the work of Jesus on earth, it is our belief that at the end of time there will be fulfillment of the Old Testament in terms of an eschatological salvation – a new heaven and a new earth: “For I am about to create new heavens and a new earth; the former things shall not be remembered or come to mind … I am about to create Jerusalem as a joy, and its people as a delight … no more shall the sound of weeping be heard in it; or the cry of distress …” (Isa 65:17-25). The second coming of Jesus the Messiah at the end of time marks the definitive fulfillment of the Old Testament in the New Testament, as prophesized in the book of Revelation, “The kingdom of the world has become the kingdom of our Lord and of his Messiah, and he will reign forever and ever” (Rv 11:15).

        God’s salvific plan is indeed a progression from the Old Testament to the New in the overall scheme of things because it is through Jesus and the Church established by him that the “incomplete and temporary” nature of the Old Testament can be fulfilled. God has revealed Himself directly to mankind through His only begotten son, “Long ago God spoke to our ancestors in many and various ways by the prophets, but in these last days he has spoken to us by a Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, through whom he also created the worlds” (Heb 1:1-2). “In him, salvation takes on a new dimension. The emphasis changes from a predominantly earthly salvation to a transcendent one that surpasses the conditions of temporal existence. It is addressed to every single human being, to the entire human race” (The Jewish People and Their Sacred Scriptures in the Christian Bible #63).


Bibliography

Collins, John J. Introduction to the Hebrew Bible. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 2004. Print.

Coogan, Michael D. The New Oxford Annotated Bible: New Revised Standard Version with Apocrypha. N.p.: Oxford UP, 2010. Print.

Raymond E. Brown, Joseph A. Fitzmyer, and Roland E. Murphy. The New Jerome Biblical Commentary. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1990. Print.

"The Jewish People and Their Sacred Scriptures in the Christian Bible." The Pontifical Biblical Commission N.p., n.d. Web. 25 Dec. 2013. <http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/pcb_documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20020212_popolo-ebraico_en.html>.


Hope of restoration

        The exile of the people of Judah into the foreign land of Babylon was seen to be a punishment of the collective disobedience of the people. Jerusalem together with the Temple was totally destroyed by the Babylonians in 586 BCE. The exile raised some fundamental questions on the religious lives of the exiled people. Had YHWH abandoned His chosen people? How could the people worship YHWH in a foreign land where the Temple, which was a central part of their worship, was no longer in existence? Would the punishment be extended to their descendants? Would there be any future hope for them?

        Shortly prior to the Babylonian exile, Jeremiah had already advised King Zedekiah to submit to the Babylonians to avoid total destruction of Judah. He told the king, “Do not listen to the words of the prophets who are telling you not to serve the king of Babylon, for they are prophesying a lie to you” (Jer 28:14). The teaching of Ezekiel dovetailed that of Jeremiah. He argued that a land could not be saved because of the righteous individuals in it. “Even if Noah, Daniel and Job, these three, were in it, they would save only their own lives by their righteousness, says the Lord God” (Ezek 14:14). Through this, he taught the people that they should no longer try to redeem the land they lost through military means of their kings but should take their own responsibilities to live a righteous life in order to be saved.

        Ezekiel furthered that the people would not be punished for the sins of their ancestors. Reward and punishment would no longer be corporate. Thus the sins and punishments of their earlier kings, notably King Manasseh would not be descended to the people who were exiled to Babylon. On the contrary, everyone would be punished or rewarded for their individual deeds. “Therefore I will judge you, O house of Israel, all of you according to your ways, says the Lord God. Repent and turn from all your transgressions; otherwise iniquity will be your ruin” (Ezek 18:30). In this way, the prophet gave new hopes to the exiled people that they should raise their spirits once again to the Lord, “Cast away from you all the transgressions that you have committed against me, and get yourselves a new heart and a new spirit” (Ezek 18:31).

        While Ezekiel urged the people to live a righteous life on the foreign land, he also gave them hope in terms of the re-establishment of a holy nation as they were scattered in a foreign land. The climax of Ezekiel’s theology comes in the section of divine holiness and Israel’s restoration in Ezek 36-16-38. The judgment of the Lord made on His people was a result of their evil deeds, “I poured out my wrath upon them for the blood that they had shed upon the land, and for the idols with which they had defiled it. I scattered them among the nations … in accordance with their conduct and their deeds I judged them”. The wicked people had profaned God’s holy name. However, YHWH would renew His unconditional covenant with His people and He would sanctify His great name among the nations, so that “the nations shall know that I am the Lord, says the Lord God”. He would give the people a new heart, put upon them a new spirit and make them a holy nation. A similar oracle of restoration was also prophesied by Jeremiah: “I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah … I will put my law within them, and I will write it on their hearts … I will be their God, and they shall be my people … I will forgive their iniquity, and remember their sin no more” (Jer 31:31-34). The salvation and justification of the people is solely based on God’s grace.

        Ezekiel continued his oracle of restoration with a vision of the dry bones in Ezek 37:1-28. The covenant that YHWH renewed with His people would be realized in two dramatic scenes: a vision of the dry bones restored to full life and a reunion of the twelve tribes of Israel as the one in the days of David. The dry bones represent a dead nation which has been utterly destroyed by Babylon with its bones scattered on the ground. The prophecy is that the almighty God will resurrect the dead body and make it live again on its own land. The second promise is that the two kingdoms, Israel and Judah, would no longer be two and the Lord will unite them into a holy nation in fulfillment of the Davidic Promise, “My servant David shall be king over them, and they shall all have one shepherd. They shall follow my ordinances and be careful to observe my statues. They shall live in the land that I gave to my servant Jacob … they and their children and their children’s children shall live there forever … Then the nations shall know that I the Lord sanctify Israel, when my sanctuary is among them forevermore” (Ezek. 38: 24-28). Finally, the promises are realized by a vision report of a new and perfect Temple and a perfect city of Jerusalem for the twelve tribes of Israel: "And the name of the city from that time on shall be, The Lord is There” (Ezek 48:35). The glory of the Lord that had departed from Israel has now returned to stay with a holy people in a cultically and morally pure land.


DeuteroPauline Letters (2)

Among the 13 Pauline Epistles, the great majority of Biblical scholars do not dispute the genuine authorship of Paul for seven letters: 1 Thess, Gal, Phil, Phlm, 1 and 2 Cor, and Rom. As for the remaining six letters, i.e., 2 Thess, Eph, Col, 1 and 2 Tim, and Tit, Biblical scholars have diverging views on their authorship. Some hold the opinion that judging from the vocabulary, style, theological message, and suspected time the letters were composed, it is possible that these six letters (or at least part of them) were not written by Paul, even though the author of each letter claimed himself to be Paul at the very beginning of it. These are commonly called “deuteroPauline letters”.

For the three Pastoral letters, i.e., 1 and 2 Tim and Tit, the primary problem with authorship is that the information in all the three letters cannot fit into the career of Paul as derived from Acts and the undisputed Pauline letters. If the letters were written by Paul (or through a scribe), there would need to be a “second career” of Paul after his captivity in Rome ended in 63 CE. Some scholars contend that Paul went back to Ephesus and then to Macedonia before returning to Rome where he was executed around 67 CE (Brown 641, 655, 672). However, this is only a hypothesis without any historical backing.

Another reason for possible pseudepigraphy of the Pastoral letters is that the church structure envisioned in them did not appear in the other undisputed letters and it might be something established beyond Paul’s lifetime. Nonetheless, it could be argued that the oncoming death of Paul as mentioned in 2 Tim 4:7 was the trigger for Paul to leave behind an instruction for establishing a church structure to exhort the faithful in sound teaching and refute the opposition (Brown 665). In fact, the use of vocabulary of 2 Tim is much less foreign to the Pauline heritage than 1 Tim and Tit (e.g., “Savior” is used as a title for God in the latter two letters which is not found in the other letters). The concept of church structure is also more sophisticated in the latter two letters than 2 Tim. Thus, there is a better chance that 2 Tim was actually written by Paul (or through a scribe) or was written shortly after Paul’s death as a farewell testament by someone who knew Paul’s last days (Brown 675).

Regarding Colossians and Ephesians, the vocabulary, or use of words in the two letters is rather different from the other undisputed letters. As for writing style, there are complex and long sentences in the two letters, which contain piled up adjectives and genitives, as well as redundant style and terms quite uncharacteristic of Pauline usage in the undisputed letters (Brown 611, 629). Looking into the theology, the Christology and ecclesiology (e.g., church as the body of Christ and Christ as the head becoming a major theme) are more developed in the two letters than the other seven undisputed letters. After all, the two letters resemble each other in overall structure and verbal parallels better than between them and the other undisputed letters (Brown 627).

For 2 Thessalonians, scholars are more evenly divided as to whether Paul wrote it. There are close resemblances between 1 and 2 Thess, which affect about one third of 2 Thess. The format is also similar between the two letters (e.g., the same opening formula, a double thanksgiving, a benediction and the same last verse). So the main problem with the authorship of 2 Thess is why would Paul copy himself in such a mechanical way? A plausible answer is that 2 Thess was written shortly after 1 Thess. As for style and vocabulary, the sentences in 2 Thess are longer and more complex than those in 1 Thess and the tone is more formal for the former. If the “man for lawlessness” in 2 Thess 2:3 is referring to Nero (only a guess) who committed suicide in 68 CE, the letter would have to be written after Paul’s death. Finally, the warning against false teachers (2 Thess 2-3, 10-11) is a rather common theme as in other deuteroPauline letters (Brown 591-594). Nonetheless, all the above are not very strong arguments for pseudepigraphy.

Bibliography

Brown, Raymond Edward. An Introduction to the New Testament. New Haven, CT: Yale UP, 2007. Print.