In Chapter 20 of Deuteronomy, it sets
out God’s command to the Israelites when they approach the lands of the
Hittites, the Amorites, the Canaanites, the Perizzites, the Hivites and the
Jebusites. If the people of the land do not accept an offer for peace and submit
themselves to the Israelites as forced labor, the Israelites should kill all
its males and take as booty the woman, the children, livestock and other things
in the town. This is referred to as the ban or holy war. Its purpose, according
to Deuteronomy, is that “they may not teach you to do all the abhorrent things
that they do for their gods, and you thus sin against the Lord your God” (Deut 20:18).
The story of Jericho in Chapter 6 of
Joshua is an ideal instance of the ban. The extent of killing is even more than
that stipulated in the Deuteronomic law – all the Canaanites living there including
men and women, young and old, oxen, sheep and donkeys were killed, with the
only exception being the prostitute Rahab, who helped the spies of the Israelites,
together with her family members. There is also no mention that the Israelites made
an offer for peace to the Canaanites residents nor were the former under the
oppression of the latter as in the scenario of exodus. Although the story of
Jericho is believed not to be a historical account, it begs the question on the
justification of the divine command of the ban.
While the ban is obviously unacceptable
from the modern ethical standards, there are a couple of theological
explanations for it. First, the Book of Deuteronomy and the Book of Joshua were
written under the heavy influence of the Josiah’s reform in 7th
century BCE and the core parts of the narrative might be written then. At that
time, “Judah was emerging from the shadow of Assyria, and laying claim to
sovereignty over the ancient territory of Israel” (Collins 194). It was thus
important for Judah to establish a national identity which differentiates
itself from those which were close but different. The worship of YHWH is by far
the most important differentiation of the Jewish people from the other nations.
The ban in the Deuteronomic law and the story of Jericho can therefore be seen
as a clear advice to the Israelites that they were strictly forbidden to engage
in the unlawful practices by the people of their nearby nations from the purist
viewpoint, in particular those concerning the worship of God. From a slightly different
perspective, the elimination of impure
nations by the ban can be regarded as “a picture of the ideal Israel under
ideal leadership” (Brown, Fitzmyer, Murphy 112).
Second, the final redaction of the
Deuteronomistic History, including the Book of Joshua, is believed to be done
during Babylonia exile in 6th century BCE. At that time, the Jewish
people should have already suffered from the violent conquest by their
conquerors. They attributed their defeat and exile to their disobedience with
God’s commands. As such, the ban in the story of Jericho would on the one hand provide
some consolation to them, while on the other remind them that they should
repent and recognize God as their only savior once again, or else their fortune
would be no better than the Canaanites.
A slight relief of the story of Jericho
is that the household of the prostitute Rahab is spared. It is common in the
Bible that God lifts up the poor, the under-privileged and the lowly. Rahab, a
woman and an outcast, is one such example. It is also noted that her family
would continue to live in Israel – a conversion into Israelites. To sum up, in
order to appreciate the theological meaning of the ban by the modern readers,
“the viewpoint of the biblical writers must be recognized: Israel’s enemies
were of no account, mere puppets, as it were, in Yahweh’s hands as he continued
his purposes for Israel” (Brown, Fitzmyer, Murphy 122).
Bibliography
Brown, Raymond Edward., Joseph A. Fitzmyer, and Roland E. Murphy. The New Jerome Biblical Commentary. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1990. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment